4 Sep
2012
4 Sep
'12
12:31 p.m.
On 9/4/12 9:05 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Peach" <john-nanog@johnpeach.com>
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:57:38 -0400 (EDT) Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
SMTP Auth to *arbitrary remote domains' MX servers*? Am I missing something, or are you?
I run an MTA on my server and auth to that from laptops and other clients. Relaying allowed for authorised users.
So, in other words, it's ok to rant and stomp our feet about the end-to-end architecture and how critical it is to support in order to diss NAT, but we're required to ignore it when discussing SMTP?
I'm not sure I'm following, there.
Feelings on spam = "this is why we can't have nice things" ~Seth