5 May
2008
5 May
'08
2:38 p.m.
On Tue, 6 May 2008 01:19:36 +0700 Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@cisco.com> wrote:
On May 6, 2008, at 12:59 AM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
If not, what should the criteria be for an "official" note of the paper?
Perhaps it's an oversimplification, but can't those who wish to publish such information simply deliver their papers at a NANOG meeting (after acceptance by the Program Committee, which acts as a gate), and then the NANOG folks post the documents along with any slides and the VoDs of their presentations, in the usual fashion?
That's certainly one very good answer. Are there others? --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb