28 Feb
2014
28 Feb
'14
12:03 p.m.
Le 28/02/2014 17:52, Nick Hilliard a écrit :
this will break horribly as soon as you have an IXP member which provides transit to other multihomed networks.
It could break if filters are based on announced prefixes. That's preciselly why uRPF is often useless. On the other hand, if a member provides transit, he will add its customer prefixes to RaDB / RIPEdb with appropriate route objects and the ACL will be updated accordingly. Shouldn't break there. -- Jérôme Nicolle +33 6 19 31 27 14