Waaay to many variables to answer the question. Each deployment is different and requires proper engineering and experience... -Mike On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Mike Hale <eyeronic.design@gmail.com> wrote:
A lot. It's a good point, but not very helpful to those engineers trying to design said infrastructure. On Jun 20, 2015 11:45 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
So....ultimately, what's the answer? A huge number of low cost, low power WAPs? Eager readers want to know. :)
what was unclear about the following?
Randy Bush wrote:
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Subject: Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network setup? To: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 08:20:33 +0900 ... having been in the back seat for many deployments over the years with all sorts of kit, i have seen great and reliable pretty large deployments of all of the above (well, xirrus only once). i have seen embarrassing messes with all of the above. i have concluded that the critical component is the engineer.
-- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.lyon@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon