15 Feb
2011
15 Feb
'11
5:08 a.m.
On 14 feb 2011, at 6:46, Frank Bulk wrote:
Requiring them to be on certain well known addresses is restrictive and creates an unnecessary digression from IPv4 practice. It's comments like this that raise the hair on admins' necks. At least mine.
I don't get this. Why spend cycles discovering a value that doesn't need to change? But I lost this argument in the IETF years ago, so I guess I'm relatively alone here.