On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Michael Sinatra <michael@rancid.berkeley.edu> wrote:
ULA is the IPv6 equivalent of RFC1918
Michael, could you explain this a bit more? In the sense that : a. Anyone can use ULA pretty much as they wish without having to go to their ISP or RIR - same for RFC1918 b. In order to get to the public Internet, with ULA addressing, some kind of translation is required - same for RFC1918 c. Without centralised registration, two different networks could end up using same ULA space - same for RFC1918 There are certainly not identical but I'd think loosely equivalent. What am I missing?
-- Mukom Akong [Tamon] ______________ “We don't LIVE in order to BREATH. Similarly WORKING in order to make MONEY puts us on a one way street to irrelevance.“ [In Search of Excellence & Perfection] - http://perfexcellence.org [Moments of TechXcellence] - http://techexcellence.net [ICT Business Integration] - http://ibiztech.wordpress.com [About Me] - http://about.me/perfexcellence