3 Oct
2013
3 Oct
'13
12:58 a.m.
On 31/08/2013 13:09, Randy Bush wrote:
i wonder if this is correlated with the high number of probes being behind nats.
Maybe this provides a bit of insight: From a test last week from all RIPE Atlas probes to a single "known good" MTU 1500 host I compared probes where I had both a ping test with ipv4.len 1020 and ipv4.len 1502. behind NAT probes: 12% 1020 bytes ping worked while 1502 failed non-NATted probes: 6% ""
this needs publication on your adventure game of a web site, please. it will seriously 'inform' some discussion going back and forth on ietf lists.
This is now published on RIPE Labs. For the adventurous: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/ripe-atlas-packet-size-matters regards, Emile Aben RIPE NCC