4 Dec
2003
4 Dec
'03
5:46 p.m.
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Petri Helenius writes on 12/4/2003 5:36 PM:
And why would blocking the /24 be appropriate instead of matching the registry?
I would refer you to the huge number of netblocks out there that stay at /16 or larger size, with the upstream not SWIP'ing or otherwise delegating netblocks in APNIC (or wherever, such as an rwhois server) as they provision IPs.
And I refer you to the blocks which are properly registered down to the /29 level and you are saying that if you are a good citizen collateral damage is recommended regardless because antispammers are either lazy or technically incompetent or like their ego boosted by intentional collateral damage? Pete