CGN is just a solution to save time, it is not a transition mechanism through IPv6 At the end (IPv6 at home) you will need at list : Dual stack or NAT64/ DNS64 My 2 cents On Apr 7, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
I wonder how much more painful just upgrading the dsl plant to support v6 would be vs deploying the cgn equipment and funneling users through that :(
IPv6 deployment is not a short term solution to IPv4 address depletion. Would you be less upset if there was IPv6 access and CPE based DS Lite (ie your IPv4 is still CGN:ed, just in a different way)?
CGN is here to stay for IPv4. The solution for long term Internet growth is IPv6.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se