16 Oct
2005
16 Oct
'05
12:08 a.m.
drc@virtualized.org (David Conrad) writes:
On Oct 15, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Tony Li wrote:
When we explored site multihoming (not rehoming) in the ways that you seem to suggest, it was effectively a set of coordinated NAT boxes around the periphery of the site. That was rejected quite quickly.
What were the reasons for rejection?
i wasn't there for that meeting. but when similar things were proposed at other meetings, somebody always said "no! we have to have end-to-end, and if we'd wanted nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4." -- Paul Vixie