javier,

I concur. What we don’t need on Nanog is outside parties deciding to “reign in” our discussions on political grounds!

 -mel beckman

On Jan 18, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Javier J <javier@advancedmachines.us> wrote:



I agree 100%.

I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine.  What I don't appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address list because of someone's behavior.

- Javier

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org> wrote:

There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be
private to list members" and "don't forward the list to autoresponders."
The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it,
should result in their removal from the list, at least until they explain
what caused them to do that and have undone it.

On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Paul Timmins wrote:

> The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the policy.
>
> https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/
>
> On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
>>  Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what is the
>>  policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is "no sharing
>>  offlist" and then someone does, there are consequences for that someone.
>>  Anne
>>
>>  --
>>  Anne P. Mitchell,  Attorney at Law
>>  Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School
>>  Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
>>  Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
>>  Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
>>  Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)
>>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
  StackPath, Sr. Neteng       |  therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________