1 Mar
2018
1 Mar
'18
5:28 p.m.
On Mar 1, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Harald Koch <chk@pobox.com> wrote:
On 1 March 2018 at 15:18, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com <mailto:owen@delong.com>> wrote: Second, RFC-1918 doesn’t apply to IPv6 at all, and (fortunately) hardly anyone uses ULA (the IPv6 analogue to RFC-1918).
Wait. What's the objection to ULA? Is it just that NAT is bad, or is there something new?
No particular objection, but I don’t see the point. What can you do with ULA that GUA isn’t suitable for? Owen