27 Oct
2019
27 Oct
'19
10:30 p.m.
Are you trying to reduce the number of ACL rules that include a known set of addresses but also minimize covered addresses that are not part of the mandatory set? Tony
On Oct 27, 2019, at 12:29, Joe Maimon <jmaimon@jmaimon.com> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 3:09 PM Joe Maimon <jmaimon@jmaimon.com> wrote:
your aim is to get to maximum aggregation .. with some overage, like 90% of a /24 ? so missing like 25 addresses in a whole /24.. (for instance)
I would be happy to get /29's missing 3 /28's missing 5, etc...
This is not punitive, its about scale.
Joe