No Rafi, I'm not "confused", I replied recounting what my organization deployed as a replacement for the hardware which Wayne is currently working on. Please refrain from further ad-hominem personal attacks in violation of this forum's charter. Just because different list participants have different approaches for solving a particular problem doesn't mean one is necessarily "wrong", and needs to be lambasted. This is what makes NANOG so diverse and great, like this country of ours. ---Rico, who is putting "NA" back in "NANOG" On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:13:37 +0300 (IDT), Rafi Sadowsky <rafi-nanog@meron.openu.ac.il> wrote:
Hi Rick
You seem slightly confused:
All the URLs you sent are for 10/100 ethernet switches/hubs (I inserted the relevant title below each url )
-- Rafi
## On 2004-08-11 10:39 -0400 Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez typed:
R"G> R"G> Wayne, R"G> R"G> My organization has recently switched from a similar infrastructure to R"G> the following: R"G> R"G> Core: http://www.svec.com/PRODUCTS/fd800ds/FD800DS2.htm FD800DS 8-port Dual Speed Hub
R"G> Distribution layer: http://www.svec.com/Products/FD521EDS.HTM FD521 5-port Fast Ethernet Switch
R"G> Wire closet: http://www.svec.com/Products/fd510eds.htm FD510 5-Port Fast Ethernet Hub
R"G> R"G> We have seen a noticeable increase in performance, ROI, and R"G> manageability following the migration away from the prior 3Com R"G> solution. If you have any implementation-specific questions, please R"G> mail me off list and I'll do my best to answer them. R"G> R"G> With regards, R"G> ---Rico R"G>