Hahahahaha! That is awesome. On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 17:50, <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
back in the day,
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ.ca.us.
existed to test the length of DNS label. circa 1992
^b.com also existed (yes, we considered ^p)
the heady days of DNS evolution!
/bill
NSI was never the only registrar. They were just the only registrar for COM, ORG, NET, EDU, and possibly a few other TLDs, but, they were, for example, never the registrar for US or many other CCTLDs.
Therefore, it was not internet wide, though I will admit that it did cover most of the widely known gTLDs.
Owen
On Oct 7, 2011, at 4:45 PM, steve pirk [egrep] wrote:
It turns out it was an artificial limitation on Network Solution's
Being the only registrar at the time, it was pretty much internet wide at that point, contrary to the RFC spec.
What was so funny was that someone got Internic/Network Solutions to up
limit. Apparently just to save some money on reprinting movie
so they would have had to change some trailers... ;-]
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 16:39, Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com> wrote:
I remember tales from when there was an eight character limit. But
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 06:16:46PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote: part. the posters... ok, that
back when you didn't have to pay for them and they assigned you a class-c block automatically. Of course it took six weeks to register because
was there
was only one person running the registry.
You may be referring to a limitation of a certain OS regarding a hostname; or some network's policy. But the DNS protocol itself never had a limit of 8 characters. When we are talking about the contents of "A" record names,
I would refer you to http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2181.txt "RFC 2181 Clarifications to the DNS Specification R. Elz, R. Bush [ July 1997 ] (TXT = 36989) (Updates RFC1034, RFC1035, RFC1123) (Updated-By RFC4035, RFC2535, RFC4343, RFC4033, RFC4034, RFC5452) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) (Stream: IETF, Area: int, WG: dnsind) "
" Elz & Bush Standards Track [Page 12] ... Occasionally it is assumed that the Domain Name System serves only the purpose of mapping Internet host names to data, and mapping Internet addresses to host names. This is not correct, the DNS is a general (if somewhat limited) hierarchical database, and can store almost any kind of data, for almost any purpose. ... 11. Name syntax " The length of any one label is limited to between 1 and 63 octets. A full domain name is limited to 255 octets (including the separators). The zero length full name is defined as representing the root of the DNS tree, and is typically written and displayed as ".". Those restrictions aside, any binary string whatever can be used as the label of any resource record. "
-- -JH
-- steve pirk refiamerica.org "father... the sleeper has awakened..." paul atreides - dune kexp.org member august '09
-- steve pirk yensid "father... the sleeper has awakened..." paul atreides - dune kexp.org member august '09 - Google+ pirk.com