16 Sep
2019
16 Sep
'19
9:01 p.m.
Ah, sorry, I didn't understand your message. Nevermind. On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ross Tajvar <ross@tajvar.io> wrote:
1. Sprint peering battle. Google it
2. He.net peering battle. Google it. 3. Google IPv6 peering battle. Google it.
All of which point to them being pompous assholes.
or point to them treating ipv6 the same as ipv4 when it comes to peering, tech, ... we are supposed to think ipv6 parity is a good thing.
Can you elaborate on this? What are they doing/not doing that you take issue with?