Scott Francis <scott@virtualis.com> wrote:
it's going to take more than one (or a hundred) data points to counter human nature (which is competitive, rather than cooperative). I guess I'm just a little too cynical to believe that the spirit of cooperation is enough to counter corporate greed, malicious activity and general cluelessness.
Cynical is right. This is not so much an issue of good vs. bad, IMHO, but of cost vs. benefit. Whether nationality-based or other hacking is a good thing or a bad thing perhaps depends on your perspective (and defenses). State sponsored information terrorists have to be encouraged by our large number of weakly protected hosts and networks. Poor monitoring, smurfable border routers, NOCs with no authority or ability to implement ad-hoc filtering, sales sites running IIS... On the other hand only a serious attack is going to motivate political and economic interests to protect themselves. The Internet today looks a lot like Europe before WWI with some nations developing tank and rocket offenses (them) while others are complacent with their cavalry-based defenses (us). What defenses do NANOG operators have against well funded extra-national attacks? -- Roger Marquis Roble Systems Consulting http://www.roble.com/