As I recall, at some point Internic was handing out subnets of old class B space and reserving the remaining subnets for the same organisation. If that's the case here then, 164.103.0.0/16 should be advertised sprintlink instead of 164.103.3.0/24. --Ismat On Tue, 30 Jan 1996, Peter Lothberg wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 17:50:09 +0000 From: William griffin <wgriffin@mci.net> To: insc@sprintlink.net Cc: trouble@mci.net, pp000314@interamp.com Subject: route not being advertised
We have a customer with the following address: 164.103.3.0/24 and it seems that you are not accepting our advertising of it. Could you please adv.
-- The darkness illuminates the light.
William Griffin Network Engineer wgriffin@mci.net (800)977-4662