Still no IPv6 in Westchester County, NY ☹ Great sign though, maybe NY will get it eventually From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+mhuff=ox.com@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Joe Loiacono Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 10:55 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Congrats to AS701 FiOS from Maryland (anonymized): enp3s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.1.164 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 fe80::b104:8f4d:e5b2:e13b prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> inet6 2600:4040:b27f:cb00:a9b1:5f59:xxxx:xxxx prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> inet6 2600:4040:b27f:cb00:24a8:7b31:xxxx:xxxx prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> inet6 2600:4040:b27f:cb00:e1b6:8b83:xxxx:xxxx prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> ether d0:67:e5:23:ec:fe txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 2518066 bytes 1448982813 (1.4 GB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 2157395 bytes 260073952 (260.0 MB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 a@b:~$ ping 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a PING 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a(2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=24.0 ms 64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=17.6 ms 64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=20.4 ms 64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=23.4 ms ^C --- 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 17.618/21.351/23.983/2.555 ms On 6/12/2022 1:55 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 11:03 PM Darrel Lewis (darlewis) <darlewis@cisco.com<mailto:darlewis@cisco.com>> wrote: I, for one, am having a hard time finding the proper words to express the joy that I am feeling at this momentous moment! It's quite amazing, I think... that it's taken so long to get to deployment you can actually see on the fios plant :) I'd note I can't see the below on my homestead, but I can at a relative's (where the ifconfig data is from). I also can't tell if the upstream will PD a block to the downstream... and the VZ CPE is 'not something I want to fiddle with', because everytime I have tried at my house I've just taken it out behind the woodshed with a maul... and replaced it with something I CAN configure successfully. (plus.. don't want that TR 069 in my home...) -chris -Darrel On Jun 11, 2022, at 7:05 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com<mailto:morrowc.lists@gmail.com>> wrote: Looks like FIOS customers may be getting ipv6 deployed toward them, finally: ifconfig snippet from local machine: inet6 2600:4040:2001:2200:73d2:6bcc:1e6b:43a1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> inet6 2600:4040:2001:2200:e87:bf36:b6cb:6ce1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> ping attempt: 64 bytes from bh-in-f106.1e100.net<http://bh-in-f106.1e100.net> (2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a): icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=8.71 ms 8ms from mclean, va to ashburn, va isn't wondrous, but at least it's ipv6 (and marginally faster than ipv4) Congrats to the 701 folk for deploying more widely! (note: I don't know exactly when this started, nor how wide it really is, but progress here is welcomed by myself at least :) ) -chris