I mentioned some of the thread re: 1.1.1.1 on portmaster-users because there seemed to be an implication that Livingston's Portmaster had a problem in its PPP implementation. Now I get a question that I don't know enough to answer. Perhaps one of you could help this fellow.... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 95 21:37:38 CDT From: Kevin Sears x3-5160 <searsk@iscmed.med.ge.com> To: portmaster-users@msen.com Subject: SNMP vs 1.1.1.1 Greetings, What does SNMP and IP address 1.1.1.1 have in common(seen a few postings on this topic tonight wrt Ascend ISDN routers and Netmanage's Chameleon)? I had a Sniffer on my 3.x.x.x subnet looking for a Portmaster problem when I noticed that I was getting SNMP get next requests from a device in another part of GE directed to my Portmaster on subnet 3.x.x.x with an address of 1.1.1.1. My portmaster's ethernet address was in that packet(i.e. 1.1.1.1) so I'm surprised. What gives? ============================== Kevin Sears Systems & Network Support Tech OnLine Center GE Medical Systems PO Box 414, m/s-W595 Milwaukee, WI 53201 Internet: searsk@med.ge.com Voice: 414-524-5160 FAX: 414-524-5305