On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 02:50:45AM -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
I believe we've been through this discussion before.
Yeah, you and I keep dancing around the same bush. My point is that, nothing is real good by you. One day, names are no good and later, addrs are no good. That's a flip-flop worthy of Bill Clinton. Looking at each specific case, you come up with answers, which may be absolutely the best answer for that case, which may also absolutely contradict another specific case. But, since the two of them are invariably conjoined, you have two contradictory and mutually exclusive answers... for the same thing. Therein, lays my frustration.
And you're still missing the point. I don't give a rat's ass what you do on your own network. But you seem to think that it's OK to keep bitching about it on NANOG, when things don't go your way. You constantly pollute this list with noise.
Maybe you should get a clue, or hire someone who has one.
Tried both, it appears non-soluble, at the moment.
Apparently. --Adam