4 Jan
2004
4 Jan
'04
4:18 p.m.
* Are they breaking anti-UCE filters by doing this? (yes)
How? They own example.com. If UCE happens to contain a forged sender of roble.com, would you consider that even remotely useful in a filter? Why should example.com be any different? they will likely never use the domain name, so probably wouldn't care if you feel the need to blacklist it explicitly, for that matter.
Maybe NANAE will let y'all borrow one of the troll signs. [Attribution removed because my remark is not aimed at any one particular potser here.)