22 Mar
2023
22 Mar
'23
5:17 p.m.
The CUPS makes a lot of sense for this application. Latency is dependent on the design, and equipment used. I’ve seen/done several designs for this using two different vendors equipment and two different BNG software stacks. When I do a design for BNG from scratch, this is how I do it now. :) As always… YMMV. - Brian
On Mar 22, 2023, at 4:02 PM, Tom Mitchell <tmitchell@netelastic.com> wrote:
Anyone have any thoughts on this CUPS thing? I have a customer asking, but it seems the lack of CP resiliency and additional latency between the DP and CP make this a really dumb idea. Has anyone tried it? Does it make any sense?
Thanks!