That's an inherent problem with the IRR system (and I am still a big proponent). There is every operational benefit from entering an object. The object augments policy. But, what is the benefit of removing an object? It doesn't operationally benefit (size of prefix lists, etc. aside) anything. I would prefer that people who proxy register, also proxy delete when services are terminated. If wishes were horses.... Eric -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Anderson Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 11:22 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Merit RADB support On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 12:08:50PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:41:16AM -0500, Kaiser, Erich wrote:
Anyone gonna email me back from RADB support?
In my experience, no.
Apologies to Merit RADB, it was BGPmon that never responds. Merit RADB actually does respond--my frustration is more about the difficulty in getting them to delete stale objects that others registered, although I was finally able to get my objects cleaned up. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus