let me try to be more concrete and helpful: lots of people who work at google *and* at cogent are on this list. none of them are doing anything to look at anything right now b/c there are no facts in evidence yet. if you want help with something or want to verify something, provide a time, a date, a path, a fact, a traceroute, a flow, a log entry a clue. cheers, t On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:54 AM, jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com> wrote:
They haven't been since at least the mid 90's :)
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
Todd Underwood wrote:
Can you scope "issue" with any facts or data?
are facts or data strictly necessary on the nanog mailing list?
Nick
T On Feb 17, 2016 11:16, "Fred Hollis" <fred@web2objects.com> wrote:
Anyone else aware of it?