On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org> wrote:
On 5/22/14 8:04 AM, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
On 5/21/14, 9:38 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
On May 21, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
Verizon Wireless is at 50% ipv6 penetration
I suspect this would go up significantly if Twitter and Instagram would IPv6 enable their services. Same for pintarest.
+1 We naturally focus a lot on network enablement here, but IMO it is a great time to focus on more web-based services embracing IPv6 with another June 6 just around the corner. :-)
A side project I've been meaning to take on:
In his really useful listing of content providers' IPv6 support, https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/ Eric Vyncke has added "CDN" to sites using an identifiable CDN.
I suspect there's a problem with the data collection on that site; looking at https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/detailed.php?country=us I really don't think the top 5 players don't support IPv6 DNS queries at all. I'd be curious to know more about how the data there is collected; I don't see any links to any description of the data collection methodology on the site. Matt