-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of Paul Vixie Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 12:29 PM To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: short Botnet list and Cashing in on DoS
..., a-la spamhaus. Bothaus anyone?
The problem with that is the list rapidly updates and must be maintained with some level of frequency and there's a level of trust involved in it as well.
i consider www.cymru.com to be an excellent beginning toward that goalset.
Going after the bots is lesser effort. The controllers are a priority.
wide scale BCP38 conformity is the only way any of this will ever happen.
You mean the bots? The controllers are behind the bots. Also, in John's presentation..: http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0410/pdf/kristoff.pdf [..]we additionally request that they resolve the RR to 127.0.0.3 before they lock out and reload the zone. We picked 127/8 as the standard. RFC 1918 wasn't suitable for obvious reasons. -M