27 Jul
2002
27 Jul
'02
11:17 a.m.
Because you could *gasp* be intelligent with your network design and do things like purchase transit from the same carriers in both your serving markets.
I guess you don't consider redundancy to be intelligent. I do. I guess you can call me stupid.
Carriers is a plural word.. How does that not accomplish redundancy again?
As I pointed out in my last post, I can't. And even if I could the economics of doing it don't make sense. If economics don't matter, then the most intelligent network design would be a redundant OC192 mesh, but I don't know even one network that does that. -Ralph