On Jan 20, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Rodrick Brown wrote:
On 1/20/07, Mark Boolootian <booloo@ucsc.edu> wrote:
Cringley has a theory and it involves Google, video, and oversubscribed backbones:
http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070119_001510.html
The following comment has to be one of the most important comments in the entire article and its a bit disturbing.
"Right now somewhat more than half of all Internet bandwidth is being used for BitTorrent traffic, which is mainly video. Yet if you surveyed your neighbors you'd find that few of them are BitTorrent users. Less than 5 percent of all Internet users are presently consuming more than 50 percent of all bandwidth."
I'm not sure why you find that disturbing. I can think of two reasons, and, they depend almost entirely on your perspective: If you are disturbed because you know that these users are early adopters and that eventually, a much wider audience will adopt this technology driving a need for much more bandwidth than is available today, then, the solution is obvious. As in the past, bandwidth will have to increase to meet increased demand. If you are disturbed by the inequity of it, then, little can be done. There will always be classes of consumers who use more than other classes of consumers of any resource. Frankly, looking from my corner of the internet, I don't think that statistic is entirely accurate. From my perspective, SPAM uses more bandwidth than BitTorrent. OTOH, another thing to consider is that if all those video downloads being handled by BitTorrent were migrated to HTTP connections instead the required amount of bandwidth would be substantially higher. Owen