I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking for.
I would agree. On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:28 AM Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi> wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 17:39, Tom Beecher <beecher@beecher.cc> wrote:
Auto-bandwidth won't help here if the bandwidth reduction is 'silent' as stated in the first message. A 1G interface , as far as RSVP is concerned, is a 1G interface, even if radio interference across it means it's effectively a 500M link.
Jason also explained the TWAMP + latency solution, which is an active solution and doesn't rely on operator or automatic bandwidth providing information, but network automatically measures latency and encodes this information in ISIS, allowing automatic traffic engineering for LSP to choose the lowest latency path. I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking for.
-- ++ytti