9 Apr
2014
9 Apr
'14
10:20 p.m.
On 4/9/2014 6:11 PM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:49:27PM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
The most "sane" out-of-mind response should only be sent *if* the out-of-mind person is named explicitly as a recipient in the RFC822 header. Anything To: somelist@somehost does not qualify :)
Jeff and just how is an algorithm supposed to detect that <jeff-kell@utc.edu> is a single human and not a list?
Because *I* set the out-of-office notification for my email address[es]. If I'm not in the recipient list, do not respond. This is a "per user" knob we are talking about here, so it knows darn well what address[es] are me. Jeff