On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 11:08:58PM -0500, Brandon Ross wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Nathan Stratton wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Roy wrote:
Sold???
360networks Snags NetRail
http://www.broadbandweek.com/newsdirect/0102/direct010220.htm
If they do I bet they don't know what they are getting into. NetRail still has a mess in the past that they need to clean up before they start fixing the current mess they have.
And exactly which part of your mess do you think I haven't cleaned up yet? Pray do tell.
Netrail's unnecessary deaggregated routes. BGP table version is 548878, local router ID is 216.74.127.225 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path --snip-- * 64.253.0.0/19 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 64.253.9.0/24 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 64.253.10.0/24 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i --snip-- Why announce two /24s terminating at the same AS out of the larger /19? --snip-- * 131.226.0.0/19 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 131.226.0.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 131.226.32.0/19 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 131.226.64.0/19 63.211.88.5 100 0 3356 4006 i * 131.226.96.0/19 63.211.88.5 100 0 3356 4006 i * 131.226.128.0/19 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i --snip-- Why announce four /19s terminating at the same AS out of the larger /16? --snip-- * 205.215.0.0/18 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 205.215.11.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 205.215.14.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 205.215.36.0 63.211.88.5 100 0 3356 4006 i * 205.215.37.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 205.215.38.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 205.215.42.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 205.215.44.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 205.215.48.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 205.215.51.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 205.215.52.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 205.215.55.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 205.215.56.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 205.215.57.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 205.215.58.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 205.215.62.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i --snip-- Why announce fifteen /24s terminating at the same AS out of the larger /18? --snip-- * 207.31.64.0/18 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 207.31.72.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.31.74.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.31.76.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.31.81.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.31.82.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.31.83.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.31.84.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.31.87.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 207.31.92.0/22 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.31.96.0/21 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 207.31.104.0/21 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.31.115.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.31.118.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.31.120.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 207.31.123.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i --snip-- Why announce twelve /24s, two /21s, and one /22 terminating at the same AS out of the larger /18? --snip-- * 207.153.64.0/18 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 207.153.72.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.73.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.74.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.75.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.84.0/23 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.90.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.92.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.93.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.98.0/23 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.102.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.104.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.108.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.110.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.111.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.115.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.121.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 207.153.122.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 207.153.124.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 207.153.127.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i --snip-- Why announce seventeen /24s, and two /23s terminating at the same AS out of the larger /18? --snip-- * 209.44.64.0/23 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 209.44.64.0/18 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 209.44.66.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 209.44.68.0/22 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 209.44.72.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 209.44.76.0/22 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 209.44.81.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 209.44.82.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 ? * 209.44.85.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 209.44.87.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 209.44.114.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 209.44.116.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i * 209.44.127.0 157.130.59.13 100 0 701 4006 i --snip-- Why announce nine /24s, two /22s, and one /23 terminating at the same AS out of the larger /18? And I won't even start on the other ASes hanging off of NetRail...
Brandon Ross 404-522-5400 EVP Engineering, NetRail http://www.netrail.net AIM: BrandonNR ICQ: 2269442 Read RFC 2644!
-- Omachonu Ogali missnglnk@informationwave.net http://www.informationwave.net