On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 18:08, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
Hi all.
When the whole SR concept was being first dreamed up, I was mildly excited about it. But then real life happened and global deployment (be it basic SR-MPLS or SRv6) is what it is, and I became less excited. This was back in 2015.
All the talk about LDPv6 this and last week has had me reflecting a great deal on where we are, as an industry, in why we are having to think about SR and all its incarnations.
So, let me be the one that stirs up the hornets' nest...
Why do we really need SR? Be it SR-MPLS or SRv6 or SRv6+?
I am clearly very far behind on my emails, but of the emails I've read so far in this thread though you have mentioned at least twice: On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 18:08, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
What I am less enthused about is being forced
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 23:22, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
it tastes funny when you are forced
Mark, does someone have a gun to your head? Are you in trouble? Blink 63 times for yes, 64 times for no ;) Cheers, James.