Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

On 10/1/2015 5:16 PM, Ca By wrote:

I run a large 464xlat dominated mobile network.

IPv4 bits are materially more expensive to deliver.

Isn't that simply a consequence of your engineering decision to use 464xlat instead of native dual-stack, as was originally envisioned for the transition?

And, as FB has shared, IPv6 is more performant for end users, and more performant is more profitable

Isn't that also at least partially a consequence of your engineering decision to use 464xlat? Matthew Kaufman