-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2/4/2014 10:47 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 10:09:02 -0800, Paul Ferguson said:
I'd like to echo Jared's sentiment here -- collectively speaking, service providers need to figure out a way to deal with this issue, before some congresscritters start to try to introduce legislation that will force you to to do it in a way that no one will like.
Can somebody explain to me why those who run eyeball networks are able to block outbound packets when the customer hasn't paid their bill, but can't seem to block packets that shouldn't be coming from that cablemodem?
(And yes, I know that in the first case, it urges the customer to cough up the bucks, and in the second case, it's usually not a revenue generator)
It's a dichotomy that is... unexplainable for me personally. - - ferg - -- Paul Ferguson VP Threat Intelligence, IID PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlLxNz8ACgkQKJasdVTchbJq6AEApzaaZ9PpPX30kUYAxsGZFzeV WR98y6VBxlocQE2oQFkBANSa4m0/JOGv+PDQovI4xSkjaE/Ru0V8woagAs1hS1C0 =KAL8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----