16 Dec
2009
16 Dec
'09
12:30 a.m.
a84-22-xx-xx.cb3rob.net. as it's RFC complient and we cannot be fucked to
haha. and what precisely did you expect? that's not really what most
On 09/12/2009 15:18, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: people would consider valid reverse dns for a mail relay. (operational practice often beats RFC where they exist, and more often than not fills in where they don't). personally, i'd recommend not being a dick and setting valid *meaningful* reverse dns for things relaying mail. (i also notice that in later replies you claim that they're breaking eu data laws, but you seem to have bleeted on enough about how you think data is something that should be in the public domain, so you can download movies, err i mean, be like totally free man.) adama.