1 Feb
2002
1 Feb
'02
11:17 a.m.
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 10:38:24 EST, David Charlap <David.Charlap@marconi.com> said:
Here's their out against NATs. They are prohibiting use "as an end-point of a non-compast local area network".
Ahh... but the box doing the NAT isn't an end-point, it's a router. ;) And if they want to argue "but it's also an endpoint for a LAN", they'll have to figure out how that's any different than a USB or FireWire setup (after all, those *are* networks too, if you think about it....) RFC2734 IPv4 over IEEE 1394. P. Johansson. December 1999. (Format: TXT=69314 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) Slippery slope there..... -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech