17 Feb
2009
17 Feb
'09
9:27 p.m.
On 2/17/09, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
I find it a shame that NAT-PT has become depreciated
the ietf has recanted and is hurriedly trying to get this back on track. of course, to save face, the name has to be changed.
with people talking about carrier grade NATS I think combining these with NAT-PT could help with the transition
cgn is not a transition tool. it is a dangerous hack to deal with the problems of a few very large consumer isps who lack sufficient space to number their customer edge.
randy
Sounds like those consumer ISPs better get started on rolling out dual stacks to the CPE. -brandon -- Brandon Galbraith Voice: 630.400.6992 Email: brandon.galbraith@gmail.com