15 Nov
2002
15 Nov
'02
7:37 p.m.
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:20:36 EST, fkittred@gwi.net said:
relatively cheap. I know our costs are lower and quality is higher than our competitors and I believe the reason is that we go for a simple network designed around cheap routers and fat pipes. We made
OK. I'll bite. What do you define as a "cheap" router, and just as important, what counts as a "fat" pipe where you are? You didn't choose the well-known router line from the well-known vendor(*) that handles line-speed packets, as long as you don't even whisper "ingress filtering" within it's hearing, did you? -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech (*) Yes, there's multiple answers to this one.