*1 Mashevich M, Folkman D, Kesar A, et. al. Exposure of human peripheral blood lymphocytes

to electromagnetic fields associated with cellular phones leads to chromosomal instability.

Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24:82–90.

On Thursday, November 5, 2020, Suresh Kalkunte <sskalkunte@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

> ...I agree with Suresh that at this time, there
> is no scientific evidence that links RF with
> any kind of bodily harm.
>
Please note that there is scientific evidence to link chronic exposure to RF result in chromosome instability*1, however there is no diagnostic test to attribute a disease as the end state.

> My point is that we should not dismiss the
> physician who thought that he may have
> found something, as some kind of
> conspiracist.
>
Thank you. I am your everyday engineer who has had to cope with after-effects of powerful EMF and hence self-taught biology. If not for medical experts (cancer biology in academia) express confidence in my analysis connecting post-exposure to RF biology to likely disease outcome, I know better than to make a fool of myself. As I have said before, this group has the clue to dig for truth and not be satisfied with pseudo concepts.

Regards,
Suresh

On Thursday, November 5, 2020, Sabri Berisha <sabri@cluecentral.net> wrote:
----- On Nov 4, 2020, at 7:19 PM, Randy Bush randy@psg.com wrote:

Hi,

>> The fact that we haven't been able to identify a factual relationship,
>> does not mean that there isn't any.
>
> just wow
>
> and, for all we know, the back side of the moon is green cheese

I don't think you got the message buried within my message. True science
is open to change, based on learning new facts. Like I said initially, I
agree with Suresh that at this time, there is no scientific evidence that
links RF with any kind of bodily harm.

The parts that Tom cited, are very much relevant, and only reinforce the
notion that at this time, we simply do not know enough. We do know, that
at the low doses we generally receive, there is no evidence for harmful
consequences.

My point is that we should not dismiss the physician who thought that he
may have found something, as some kind of conspiracist. That's not how
scientific progress is achieved.

Thanks,

Sabri