28 Aug
2009
28 Aug
'09
10:29 a.m.
In a message written on Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 09:19:50AM -0500, Jack Bates wrote:
Looking at just Oklahoma, I'm not sure AT&T could get even 200kb to every household for $200b.
For an interesting set of cost comparisons.... In most locations every home has electrical service. What's the cost per household? Most houses have a statem maintained road in front of them, what is the cost per household? Many (although a lower number) of "city" water and sewer, what is the cost per household? For a number of reasons I would expect Broadband to be cheaper than any of those, per household; but should definately not exceed any of them in cost. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/