On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, [iso-8859-1] Bjørn Mork wrote:
"Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com> writes:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, [iso-8859-1] Bjørn Mork wrote:
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> writes:
fred, seeing as there is not now, and likely never will be fixed versions for many of our routers (25xx, 17xx, ..., and i can't
No?
Logged in to ftp.cisco.com. Current remote directory is /cisco. ncftp /cisco > dir ios/12.3/12.3.15a/2500/ -rw-rw-r-- 1 518 1 11013444 Jul 25 14:50 c2500-c-l.123-15a.bin -rw-rw-r-- 1 518 1 12303148 Jul 25 15:17 c2500-i-l.123-15a.bin -rw-rw-r-- 1 518 1 16191744 Jul 25 14:34 c2500-is-l.123-15a.bin
note image size of 11/12/16 mb... note that many (most?) 2500's don't have 16M flash :( many, many referenced before (term servers for instance) are 2mb flash boxes. It's possible that Randy's referring to this sort of 2500.
I might be wrong, but I thought an image with IPv6 support required 16 MB flash on the 2500? Anyway, the upgrade path is there although
and in order to get 30k devices (more actually) upgraded I'll have to spend 30k+X dollars? I'm fairly certain that's not going to happen. This gets back to 2 things: 1) no (practical) upgrade path under security vulnerabilities (hence reluctance of vendors to release info without fix) 2) possibly unhappy customers and vulnerabilities silently fixed in other code trains. Oh well...