### On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:02:18 +0100 (BST), "Stephen J. Wilcox" ### <steve@telecomplete.co.uk> casually decided to expound upon Abhishek ### Verma <abhishekv.verma@gmail.com> the following thoughts about "Re: ### Order of ASes in the BGP Path": SJW> from time to time people say 'but the rfc says...'. but theres a big SJW> place for precedent and common practice too. True... but the latest BGP draft series attempts to address BCP and updates on 1771. Typically, the answers sought in light of current BGP practices can be found in the draft. -- /*===================[ Jake Khuon <khuon@NEEBU.Net> ]======================+ | Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | --------------- | | for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| N E T W O R K S | +=========================================================================*/