On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 03:43:11PM -0400, John Curran wrote:
On Aug 13, 2010, at 1:55 PM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
could you provide 4 numbers for me please?
% of ARIN managed resource covered by standard RSA? % of ARIN managed legacy resource covered by legacy RSA? % of ARIN managed legacy resource not otherwise covered? % of ARIN region entities (A & B above) that have offices/relationships with other RIRs that have a divergent transfer process in place?
Bill -
We'll work on generating these numbers to the extent possible for the upcoming meeting; back in April, I noted that we had about 21% of the legacy space (by total IP address count) under an LRSA (6%) or RSA (15%). For now, this is first order estimate for your second and third questions. These numbers keep going up, so we'll need some work to generate current ones for the next meeting. Regarding the last one, that's very difficult to obtain; how do you see it impacting the overall outcome?
/John
these questions were asked in response to Owens views on the ARIN reclaimation process in the case of documented transfers outside the existing ARIN processes. my assertion to Owen was that his views would apply directly to the folks under a standard RSA. My reading of the LRSA suggests that ARIN has a much narrower remit on recovery of resources covered by that document. the third camp was/is a much thornier patch of ground, fraught w/ peril if ARIN takes action on recovery, at least imho. #4, well that sounds like fruitful ground for inter-RIR coordination. for example, if 75% of the total resource under ARIN administration is legacy, then 25% is covered by the standard RSA. Within the 75%, 6% of it is under LRSA and 15% of it is under the standard RSA. if this characterization is in ballpark, then Owens view on reclaimation only holds for ~30% of the resource under ARIN administration. Correct? --bill