Why won't the rest of the world see extra hops and increased latency reaching my network (for the 50% of the time that the wrong transit provider is picked).
Because you could *gasp* be intelligent with your network design and do things like purchase transit from the same carriers in both your serving markets.
I guess you don't consider redundancy to be intelligent. I do. I guess you can call me stupid.
The problem here Ralph is that you see absolutely no problem with doing things on your network that have minimal benefit to you, yet have global impact.
The problem here Paul is that you can't seem to see the forest for the trees. If you consider routing table size reduction so important, why don't you filter all /24's? That will give you much more benefit than /20's that have been de-aggregated. -Ralph