Nick B <nick@pelagiris.org> wrote:
I'm about 90% sure that in a fair court, it would be concluded that disabling the reported URL qualifies as disabling access to the material. The court might then issue an injunction to, in the future, disable *all* *possible* access to the material, but that's not the current text of the law. YMMV
The crux of the issue is whether a single DMCA take down notice refers only to the content itemized in the notice, or to _all_ content that matches the identification in the notice. It is a *significant* difference, because the former requires the _complainant_ to identify all the 'infringing' items, while the latter requires the notice _recipient_ to search out all other content that matches the notice. Obviously, each side would rather have the other guy do all the work.`