On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Nathan Ward wrote:
On 4/02/2010, at 9:19 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
I would hope that the APNIC would opt not to assign networks that would contain 1.1.1.1 or 1.2.3.4 to customers for exactly that reason. The signal-to-noise ratio for those addresses is likely pretty high. The noise is likely contained on many internal networks for now because a corresponding route doesn't show up in the global routing table at the moment. Once that changes....
1.1.1/24 and 1.2.3/24 are assigned to APNIC. Unless they release them, the general public will not get addresses in these.
Yes, I did see that. What I noticed yesterday was that there were no prefixes that cover 1.1.1.1 or 1.2.3.4 being announced globally at that point. jms