I presume you were contacting them due to their (apparently) bogus SPF parsing? Seems they recently broke something and email servers I've been sending from for 10 years without much configuration change recently started getting generic SPF-looking failure messages (I guess they don't properly parse "+MX -ALL"?). Given the automated form linked at that page also returns garbage about how my IPs look fine and aren't blacklisted and there is no reason why mail shouldn't deliver (why bother having a box to put the error message?), can someone over there contact off-list? Matt On 6/15/19 1:44 AM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
Yo All!
Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ?
Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed? Or is M$ more special than the rest of us?
RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 01:38:16 +0000 From: The Outlook.com Team <postmaster@outlook.com> To: <gem@rellim.com> Subject: Fw: gem : rellim541
This email address is not monitored. Please visit http://postmaster.outlook.com for information about sending email to Outlook.com, including troubleshooting information. If you are an Outlook.com user please visit http://answers.microsoft.com/ to learn more about our services, find answers to your questions, and share your feedback.
Sincerely,
Outlook.com Team Microsoft One Microsoft Way. Redmond, WA 98052, USA.
Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our online Privacy Statement at http://privacy.microsoft.com