Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 6/1/10 9:22 AM, Justin Wilson wrote:
He has since reversed that stance and they are working on IPV6 support, at least that is what I read somewhere. I don¹t blame the guy really. If people want a feature they should pony up a little money. Otherwise it is free software with no implied support.
I feel that IPv6 should be a minimum requirement. At the time the author felt it should be an advanced paid-for feature. I treat commercial vendors the same way: no IPv6, no sale. That nastygram made me not want to donate (money or code) to IPplan. One shouldn't get into open source expecting money.
The world moves forward and what is seen as a minimum requirement is eventually going to move with it.
~Seth
didn't we just have this whole discussion three months ago? that being said, IPv6 exists in the beta versions that are currently available. http://sourceforge.net/projects/iptrack/files/ --Peter