John Levine:
In article <em0d4f8349-621d-4edf-90ea-c8ab95df44d1@desktop-k5pu39b> you write:
The main issue with the notion of keeping abuse@ separate from a dedicated DMCA takedown mailbox is companies like IP Echelon will just blindly E-mail whatever abuse POC is associated with either the AS record or whichever POCs are specifically associated with the NET block.
So it becomes kind of difficult to keep them routing to different places.
The guys doing the DMCA takedowns use automated tooling. So asking them nicely isn't going to help you.
Seems to me that if you've registered your DMCA address in the Library of Congress database, and they send takedowns somewhere else, that's their problem, not not yours.
If you haven't registered, you should. You can do the whole thing online in a couple of minutes. The fee is $6 per update no matter how many business names and domain names you register.
thanks this is useful. has anyone practical experience with how many of the usual DMCA email sending companies actually take this into account when they send their automated emails? Does creating a record there actually result in a substantial fraction of DMCA emails being routed to the email address given there? -- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu